Journal Home
Login
Register
Open Access Journal
Submit a Paper
Propose a Special lssue
Open Access
ARTICLE
THE PRICE OF WINNING: WHEN INDIVIDUAL BONUSES BACKFIRE ON TEAMS
Issue Vol. 1 No. 01 (2024): V0LUME01 ISSUE01 --- Section Articles
pdf
Abstract
Every manager faces a fundamental choice: should you reward your team for cooperating, or for competing? It’s a high-stakes question. Team-based rewards can build a sense of unity but often invite some members to slack off. On the other hand, competitive, winner-take-all bonuses can light a fire under individuals but risk turning colleagues into rivals, leading to less help and even outright sabotage. This article dives into this dilemma, exploring how these forces play out, especially when teams are a mix of high-fliers and steady contributors. We look at the predictions from economic theory and then hold them up against the results of controlled lab experiments that mimic these workplace dynamics. The findings are surprising. Big bonuses don't always spark the extra effort you'd expect, and they certainly don't make up for the loss of helping hands. We also find that while people are reluctant to sabotage their teammates, they are also quick to stop offering help once competition enters the picture. For managers, the takeaway is clear: creating a balanced, mixed-skill team and focusing on more than just individual prizes is often the winning strategy.
Keywords
References
1. Alchian, A. A., & Demsetz, H. (1972). Production, information costs, and economic organization. American Economic Review, 62(5), 777–795.
2. Balafoutas, L., Lindner, F., & Sutter, M. (2012). Sabotage in tournaments: Evidence from a natural experiment. Kyklos, 65(4), 425–441.
3. Bilen, E., & Matros, A. (2021). The queen's gambit: Explaining the superstar effect using evidence from chess [Working Paper]. https://ernbilen.github.io/pdfs/Superstar_Effect.pdf.
4. Bock, O., Baetge, I., & Nicklisch, A. (2014). hroot: Hamburg registration and organization online tool. European Economic Review, 71(C), 117–120.
5. Brown, J. (2011). Quitters never win: The (adverse) incentive effects of competing with superstars. Journal of Political Economy, 119(5), 982–1013.
6. Brown, M., & Heywood, J. (2009). Helpless in finance: The cost of helping effort among bank employees. Journal of Labor Research, 30(2), 176–195.
7. Buser, T., & Dreber, A. (2016). The flipside of comparative payment schemes. Management Science, 62(9), 2626–2638.
8. Carpenter, J., Matthews, P. H., & Schirm, J. (2010). Tournaments and office politics: Evidence from a real effort experiment. American Economic Review, 100(1), 504–517.
9. Charness, G., & Levine, D. I. (2004). Sabotage! Survey evidence on when it is acceptable [Working Paper]. https://escholarship.org/content/qt5qw3h8fj/qt5qw3h8fj_noSplash_feb21480d25a896f5caf476c7787e01a.pdf?t=krno8w.
10. Charness, G., Masclet, D., & Villeval, M. C. (2014). The dark side of competition for status. Management Science, 60(1), 38–55.
11. Chen, K.‐P. (2003). Sabotage in promotion tournaments. Journal of Law, Economics and Organization, 19(1), 119–140.
12. Chowdhury, S. M., & Gürtler, O. (2015). Sabotage in contests: A survey. Public Choice, 164(1–2), 135–155.
13. Crosetto, P., & Filippin, A. (2013). The “bomb” risk elicitation task. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 47(1), 31–65.
14. Danilov, A., Harbring, C., & Irlenbusch, B. (2019). Helping under a combination of team and tournament incentives. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 162, 120–135.
15. Dechenaux, E., Kovenock, D., & Sheremeta, R. M. (2015). A survey of experimental research on contests, all‐pay auctions and tournaments. Experimental Economics, 18(4), 609–669.
16. del Corral, J., Prieto‐Rodriguez, J., & Simmons, R. (2010). The effect of incentives on sabotage: The case of Spanish Football. Journal of Sports Economics, 11(3), 243–260.
17. Deutscher, C., Frick, B., Gürtler, O., & Prinz, J. (2013). Sabotage in tournaments with heterogeneous contestants: Empirical evidence from the soccer pitch. The Scandinavian Journal of Economics, 115(4), 1138–1157.
18. Dickinson, D. L., & Isaac, R. M. (1998). Absolute and relative rewards for individuals in team production. Managerial and Decision Economics, 19(4–5), 299–310.
19. Drago, R., & Garvey, G. T. (1998). Incentives for helping on the job: Theory and evidence. Journal of Labor Economics, 16(1), 1–25.
20. Dye, R. A. (1984). The trouble with tournaments. Economic Inquiry, 22(1), 147–149.
21. Fischbacher, U. (2007). z‐tree: Zurich toolbox for ready‐made economic experiments. Experimental Economics, 10(2), 171–178.
22. Garicano, L., & Palacios‐Huerta, I. (2005). Sabotage in tournaments: Making the beautiful game a bit less beautiful [Working Paper]. https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=831964.
23. Garvey, G. T., & Swan, P. L. (1992). Managerial objectives, capital structure, and the provision of worker incentives. Journal of Labor Economics, 10(4), 357–379.
24. Gürtler, O., & Münster, J. (2013). Rational self‐sabotage. Mathematical Social Sciences, 65(1), 1–4.
25. Gürtler, O., Münster, J., & Nieken, P. (2013). Information policy in tournaments with sabotage. The Scandinavian Journal of Economics, 115(3), 932–966.
26. Hamilton, B. H., Nickerson, J. A., & Owan, H. (2003). Team incentives and worker heterogeneity: An empirical analysis of the impact of teams on productivity and participation. Journal of Political Economy, 111(3), 465–497.
27. Harbring, C., & Irlenbusch, B. (2008). How many winners are good to have? On tournaments with sabotage. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 65(3–4), 682–702.
28. Harbring, C., & Irlenbusch, B. (2011). Sabotage in tournaments: Evidence from a laboratory experiment. Management Science, 57(4), 611–627.
29. Harbring, C., Irlenbusch, B., Krakel, M., & Selten, R. (2007). Sabotage in corporate contests—An experimental analysis. International Journal of the Economics of Business, 14(3), 367–392.
30. Hill, B. (2014a). The heat is on: Tournament structure, peer effects, and performance. Journal of Sports Economics, 15(4), 315–337.
31. Hill, B. (2014b). The superstar effect in 100‐meter tournaments. International Journal of Sport Finance, 9(2), 111.
32. Hollinger, R., & Clark, J. (1983). Theft by employees. Lexington Books.
33. Johnson, D., & Salmon, T. C. (2016). Sabotage versus discouragement: Which dominates post promotion tournament behavior? Southern Economic Journal, 82(3), 673–696.
34. Kräkel, M. (2005). Helping and sabotaging in tournaments. International Game Theory Review, 7(2), 211–224.
35. Lawler, E. E., Mohrman, S. A., & Benson, G. (2001). Organizing for high performance: Employee involvement TQM, reengineering, and knowledge management in the Fortune 1000: The CEO report. Jossey‐Bass.
36. Lazear, E. P. (1989). Pay equality and industrial politics. Journal of Political Economy, 97(3), 561–580.
37. Lazear, E. P., & Rosen, S. (1981). Rank‐order tournaments as optimum labor contracts. Journal of Political Economy, 89(5), 841–864.
38. Lazear, E. P., & Shaw, K. L. (2007). Personnel economics: The economist's view of human resources. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 21(4), 91–114.
39. Münster, J. (2007). Selection tournaments, sabotage, and participation. Journal of Economics and Management Strategy, 16, 943–970.
40. Nalebuff, B. J., & Stiglitz, J. E. (1983). Prizes and incentives: Towards a general theory of compensation and competition. The Bell Journal of Economics, 14(1), 21–43.
41. Roth, A. E., & Kagel, J. H. (1995). The handbook of experimental economics (Vol. 1). Princeton university press.
42. Shubik, M. (1954). Does the fittest necessarily survive. In M. Shubik (Ed.), Readings in game theory and related behavior. Doubleday.
43. Tullock, G. (1980). Efficient rent seeking. In J. M. Buchanan, R. D. Tollison, & G. Tollison (Eds.), Toward a theory of the rent‐seeking society (pp. 97–112). Texas A&M University Press.
44. Vandegrift, D., & Yavas, A. (2010). An experimental test of sabotage in tournaments. Journal of Institutional and Theoretical Economics, 166(2), 259–285.
45. Yamane, S., & Hayashi, R. (2015). Peer effects among swimmers. The Scandinavian Journal of Economics, 117(4), 1230–1255.
