Journal Home
Login
Register
Open Access Journal
Submit a Paper
Propose a Special lssue
Open Access
ARTICLE
Hybrid Security Orders, Non-State Violence, and the Political Economy of Insecurity in Nigeria’s Conflict Ecosystem
Issue Vol. 2 No. 02 (2025): VOLUME 02 ISSUE 02 --- Section Articles
pdf
Abstract
The contemporary Nigerian security landscape is characterized by the coexistence of state institutions, armed non-state actors, community militias, criminal syndicates, religious movements, and transnational terrorist networks, all embedded within a deeply contested political economy. This article develops a theoretically grounded and empirically informed interpretation of Nigeria’s evolving conflict ecosystem by situating it within broader debates on hybrid political orders, non-state actors in international relations, and the global transformation of warfare. Drawing on the analytical frameworks of new wars theory, hybrid governance, and transnational activism, the study demonstrates how Boko Haram, rural banditry, Niger Delta militancy, and inter-religious violence are not isolated pathologies but structurally interlinked outcomes of state fragility, elite competition, and globalized security dynamics (Kaldor, 2006; Boege et al., 2009; Reno, 2011).
The article further integrates strategic assessments of global and regional security environments provided by contemporary intelligence analysis to contextualize Nigeria’s conflicts within wider geopolitical and ideological currents (National Intelligence Council, 2023). By doing so, it challenges conventional state-centric interpretations of Nigerian insecurity and instead advances a relational model in which state and non-state actors continuously renegotiate authority, legitimacy, and control. Drawing extensively on the literature on Boko Haram, the Niger Delta, and rural banditry, the study reveals how violence functions simultaneously as a political instrument, an economic strategy, and a form of social ordering (Aghedo & Osumah, 2012; Comolli, 2015; Ikelegbe, 2006; Okoli & Ugwu, 2019).
Methodologically, the article employs a qualitative, interpretivist research design based on intensive textual analysis of scholarly literature, policy reports, and international security assessments. This allows for a nuanced reconstruction of the discursive, material, and institutional dimensions of Nigerian conflict. The results demonstrate that Nigeria’s insecurity cannot be meaningfully addressed through militarized counterterrorism or state-building alone, because violence is embedded in hybrid governance arrangements that link local actors to global networks of finance, ideology, and power (Lake, 2010; Sikkink, 1998).
The discussion situates Nigeria’s conflicts within broader debates about sovereignty, non-state power, and global order, arguing that Nigeria exemplifies a post-Westphalian security environment in which authority is fragmented and contested across multiple levels (Waltz, 1979; Kant, 1795). The article concludes by proposing that sustainable peace in Nigeria requires not the restoration of a mythical centralized state monopoly of violence, but the construction of inclusive, negotiated, and accountable hybrid political orders that recognize the realities of non-state authority while embedding them within normative frameworks of peace and human security (Olojo, 2021; Mercy Corps, 2016).
Keywords
References
1. International Crisis Group. (2020). Violence in Nigeria’s Northwest: Rolling Back the Mayhem.
2. Berridge, G. (2015). Diplomacy: Theory and Practice. Springer.
3. Aghedo, I., & Osumah, O. (2012). The Boko Haram Uprising: How Should Nigeria Respond? Third World Quarterly, 33(5), 853–869.
4. Longley, R. (2022, July 28). What Are Non-State Actors? Thought Co.
5. National Intelligence Council. (2023, July 5). Retrieved from dni.gov.
6. Obi, C. (2009). Nigeria's Niger Delta: Understanding the Complex Drivers of Violent Oil-related Conflicts. Africa Development, 34(2), 103–128.
7. Reno, W. (2011). Warfare in Independent Africa. Cambridge University Press.
8. Mercy Corps. (2016). The Role of Youth in Ending Violence in Nigeria.
9. Kaldor, M. (2006). New and Old Wars: Organized Violence in a Global Era. Polity Press.
10. Alao, A. (2013). Nigeria and the Struggle for Stability in the Niger Delta. International Journal on World Peace, 30(3), 39–64.
11. Sikkink, M. E. (1998). Activists Beyond Borders. Cornell University Press.
12. Comolli, V. (2015). Boko Haram: Nigeria's Islamist Insurgency. Hurst & Company.
13. Institute for Economics and Peace. (2021). Global Terrorism Index 2021.
14. Olaniyan, A., & Yahaya, A. (2016). Cattle Rustling and Rural Banditry in Northern Nigeria. African Security Review, 25(3), 1–10.
15. Boege, V., Brown, A., Clements, K., & Nolan, A. (2009). Hybrid Political Orders, Not Fragile States. Peace Review, 21(1), 13–21.
16. Ikelegbe, A. (2006). The Economy of Conflict in the Oil Rich Niger Delta Region of Nigeria. Nordic Journal of African Studies, 15(2), 208–234.
17. Lake, D. A. (2010). Rethinking the Global Order: The Role of Non-State Actors. International Organization, 54(4), 715–736.
18. Waltz, K. (1979). Theory of International Politics. Addison-Wesley.
19. Garth Jowett, & O’Donnell, V. (2006). Propaganda and Persuasion.
20. Bryman, A. (2016). Social Research Methods (5th ed.). Oxford University Press.
21. Reno, W. (2011). Violence and the State in Africa. Journal of Peace Research, 48(2), 165–174.
22. Olojo, A. (2021). Nigeria’s Inter-Religious Council: Advancing Peace amid Religious and Violent Conflicts. The Conversation Africa.
23. Kant, I. (1795). Perpetual Peace: A Philosophical Sketch. American Peace Society.
