Journal Home
Login
Register
Open Access Journal
Submit a Paper
Propose a Special lssue
Open Access
ARTICLE
Mechanistic Explanation, Neural Noise, and the Philosophy of Decision-Making: Integrating Multilevel Neuroscience with Concepts of Agency and Freedom
Issue Vol. 2 No. 01 (2025): Volume 02 Issue 01 --- Section Articles
Abstract
The scientific and philosophical investigation of decision-making has undergone a profound transformation over the past several decades, driven by advances in neuroscience, computational modeling, and mechanistic explanation. Decision-making is no longer understood merely as a rational, abstract cognitive faculty, but as an embodied, neural process shaped by stochastic dynamics, multilevel mechanisms, evolutionary constraints, and philosophical interpretations of agency and freedom. This article develops an integrated theoretical framework for understanding perceptual and voluntary decision-making by synthesizing empirical neuroscience, computational theories, and philosophical analysis. Drawing strictly on the provided references, the article explores how neural noise, evidence accumulation, cortical microstimulation, and motor planning mechanisms interact to generate decisions, while also examining the implications of these findings for debates about free will, personal responsibility, and reductionism in the philosophy of mind. Mechanistic explanations are analyzed as a unifying framework capable of bridging levels of analysis, from neural circuits to behavior and normative concepts of personhood. Particular attention is paid to the tension between indeterminacy in neural processes and the coherence of agency, as well as the role of evolutionary and adaptive perspectives in shaping neural decision architectures. By elaborating each theoretical position in depth, addressing counterarguments, and examining unresolved conceptual challenges, this article argues that a mechanistic, probabilistic understanding of decision-making does not undermine agency but instead reframes it within a scientifically grounded model of the human person. The result is a comprehensive, interdisciplinary account that advances both neuroscience and philosophy by clarifying how decisions emerge from noisy neural systems while remaining intelligible within broader explanatory and normative frameworks.
