European Journal of Emerging Economics and Management
ISSN: Applied Publication Frequency: Halfyearly Open Access | International Journal | Double Blinded Peer Reviewed Journal
All articles published by The Parthenon Frontiers and its associated journals are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY 4.0) International License unless otherwise stated. Authors retain full copyright of their published work. By submitting their manuscript, authors agree to grant The Parthenon Frontiers a non-exclusive license to publish, archive, and distribute the article worldwide. Authors are free to: Share their article on personal websites, institutional repositories, or social media platforms. Reuse their content in future works, presentations, or educational materials, provided proper citation of the original publication.
Climate Vulnerability, Economic Resilience, and Policy Adaptation in Developing Economies: An Integrative Analysis
Developing economies confront a complex interplay between climate change vulnerabilities, economic resilience, and policy adaptation strategies. This study critically examines the multidimensional challenges posed by environmental perturbations and their implications for sovereign debt, financial markets, and social inequalities. Drawing upon an extensive review of empirical and theoretical literature, the research integrates insights from climate science, economics, and policy analysis to illuminate the systemic risks inherent in climate-sensitive sectors. Particular attention is given to the disproportionate effects on developing countries, where infrastructural limitations, financial fragility, and socio-political constraints exacerbate vulnerability (Ravindranath & Sathaye, 2002). The study systematically explores the mechanisms by which climate-induced shocks translate into economic stress, including increased sovereign borrowing costs, market volatility, and disrupted trade flows (Beirne et al., 2021; Boitan & Marchewka-Bartkowiak, 2022). Furthermore, it evaluates the efficacy of adaptation strategies and mitigation policies in enhancing resilience, with a focus on both governmental and non-governmental interventions, including health valuation frameworks (Organization WH, 2023) and technological innovations in energy and carbon footprint reduction (Rees & Wackernagel, 2023; Pasek et al., 2023). The research synthesizes current debates on climate finance, policy design, and international negotiation dynamics, underscoring the tensions between equity, economic efficiency, and environmental sustainability (Schroeder, 2010; Lange et al., 2010). Ultimately, the article advances a conceptual framework for integrating environmental, social, and economic dimensions into coherent policy responses, highlighting avenues for future research and cross-sectoral collaboration.
Copyright (c) 2025 Dr. Emilia Novak (Author) https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
Agglomeration Economies, Environmental Governance, And Esg Integration: A Multi-Scale Analysis of Industrial and Regional Dynamics in China
This research investigates the intricate interrelations among industrial agglomeration, environmental regulations, technological adoption, and corporate environmental, social, and governance (ESG) practices within the Chinese context. Drawing upon a synthesis of spatial, social, and economic network analyses, the study emphasizes the mechanisms through which industrial concentration influences pollutant emissions while simultaneously shaping economic growth and public perceptions of sustainability initiatives. The analysis situates the discussion within both theoretical and empirical perspectives, integrating classical frameworks of agglomeration economics with contemporary debates surrounding ESG adoption, corporate social responsibility, and regional policy interventions. By incorporating insights from urban and regional economics, industrial organization, and environmental management, the study explicates the spatial spillover effects inherent to agglomeration and their implications for localized policy-making. Findings reveal that industrial clusters, while enhancing productivity and innovation through density externalities, exhibit complex environmental trade-offs that are mediated by regulatory stringency and technological capacity. Moreover, public awareness and attitudes toward carbon neutrality are increasingly informed by ESG principles, suggesting a convergence of corporate strategy and societal expectations in sustainability transitions. The study offers a nuanced discourse on the duality of industrial agglomeration as both an economic catalyst and an environmental challenge, highlighting policy instruments and governance frameworks capable of aligning growth trajectories with sustainable development goals. Implications extend to regional planning, corporate strategy, and regulatory design, with recommendations emphasizing the integration of ESG criteria into both industrial and municipal decision-making. This paper contributes to scholarly debates by bridging network-based analyses of industrial agglomeration with emerging ESG frameworks, offering a comprehensive model for assessing the interplay of economic density, environmental stewardship, and societal engagement.
Copyright (c) 2025 Liang Zhao (Author) https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
Political Embeddedness, Audit Architecture, and Corporate Tax Avoidance in Financially Regulated Banking Systems: Evidence from Emerging and Islamic-Oriented Markets
Corporate tax avoidance has long been recognized as a strategically important yet institutionally sensitive phenomenon in modern financial systems. Within banking industries, where firms are simultaneously profit-maximizing corporations and custodians of public trust, the dynamics of tax avoidance become even more complex. These complexities are magnified in emerging and institutionally heterogeneous markets, particularly those characterized by political embeddedness, regulatory fragmentation, and religiously informed governance structures such as Islamic banking. This study develops an integrated theoretical and empirical framework to examine how political connections and audit architecture interact to shape tax avoidance strategies in regulated banking environments, with particular emphasis on Islamic financial institutions. Building on agency theory, political economy theory, and institutional theory, the article situates tax avoidance not merely as a technical outcome of accounting choices but as a politically mediated organizational behavior shaped by governance arrangements, ownership structures, and audit mechanisms. In doing so, it engages deeply with the growing body of literature that has examined tax avoidance across corporate contexts, including studies of managerial ability, ownership concentration, internal control, and audit committee characteristics (Akbari et al., 2018; Annuar et al., 2014; Bimo et al., 2019; Al Lawati & Hussainey, 2021). Central to the conceptual architecture of the present study is the proposition that political connections fundamentally alter the risk-reward calculus of tax avoidance, particularly when combined with joint audit regimes that may either constrain or facilitate opportunistic behavior. The empirical and conceptual core of this article is anchored in the seminal work of Ajili and Khlif (2020), who demonstrated that political connections in Islamic banks are systematically associated with higher levels of tax avoidance, and that the presence of joint auditors significantly moderates this relationship. Their findings challenge conventional assumptions that Islamic ethical frameworks or enhanced audit oversight automatically reduce opportunistic tax behavior. Instead, their work reveals a more nuanced reality in which politically embedded banks leverage both regulatory proximity and audit complexity to optimize tax outcomes. By embedding their results within a broader comparative and theoretical framework, this article extends their insights beyond the immediate empirical context and into a generalizable model of politically mediated tax governance. Methodologically, the article adopts a rigorous qualitative-analytical approach that synthesizes prior econometric findings, institutional indicators, and comparative governance analysis. Rather than presenting new numerical estimates, the study reconstructs causal pathways and behavioral mechanisms through careful interpretation of existing empirical literature, including cross-national studies of tax avoidance, audit effort, ownership separation, and political influence (Badertscher et al., 2013; Bae, 2016; Beer et al., 2019; Bianchi et al., 2018). This interpretive strategy allows for a richly textured understanding of how political, organizational, and audit variables co-evolve in shaping tax outcomes. The results demonstrate that politically connected banks, particularly in weak institutional environments, are structurally advantaged in pursuing aggressive tax strategies, even when subject to joint audits or formal governance reforms. These outcomes are further conditioned by ownership concentration, managerial incentives, and the symbolic versus substantive nature of audit quality. The discussion elaborates the theoretical implications of these findings for debates on regulatory capture, ethical finance, and the effectiveness of audit-based governance mechanisms. It also highlights the paradox that mechanisms designed to enhance transparency and accountability may, under certain political conditions, instead provide additional layers through which sophisticated avoidance strategies can be legitimized. By integrating political economy with auditing and taxation scholarship, this article contributes a comprehensive framework for understanding tax avoidance in complex financial systems. It offers implications for regulators, auditors, and policymakers seeking to design governance architectures that are resilient to political capture and capable of genuinely constraining opportunistic fiscal behavior.
Copyright (c) 2025 Dr. Matteo Rinaldi, Dr. Sofia K. Marković, Dr. Nabil A. Ben Youssef (Author) https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
Political Economy of Corporate Tax Behavior, Earnings Management, and Market Power in Emerging and Advanced Economies
The interaction between corporate taxation, political influence, market structure, and firm-level financial reporting behavior has become one of the most contested domains in contemporary political economy and accounting research. As governments rely increasingly on corporate income taxation while multinational enterprises expand their ability to shift profits across borders, firms have developed increasingly sophisticated strategies to influence both the measurement of taxable income and the political environment in which taxation is determined. This study develops an integrated theoretical and empirical framework that explains how earnings management, tax planning, political connections, and market concentration jointly shape corporate tax outcomes. Drawing upon insights from accounting, economics, and political economy, the article conceptualizes corporate taxation not as a neutral administrative process but as an arena of strategic interaction between firms and the state, mediated by institutional structures, lobbying activity, and market power. The theoretical backbone of the analysis is rooted in classical models of tax compliance and evasion, particularly the deterrence framework articulated by Allingham and Sandmo (1972), which frames tax behavior as a rational response to enforcement probability and penalties. However, this framework is extended by incorporating modern theories of corporate governance and incentives, such as those articulated by Armstrong et al. (2012), which emphasize the internal motivations of managers and the role of compensation structures in shaping tax planning aggressiveness. A central empirical and conceptual anchor of the study is the body of evidence on Malaysian firms, especially the demonstration that earnings management can be used strategically to influence tax policy and political outcomes (Adhikari, Derashid, and Zhang, 2005). This evidence reveals that corporate reporting behavior is not merely reactive to tax rules but can be proactively deployed to shape the future design and enforcement of those rules. By embedding this insight within a broader cross-national and sectoral context, the article develops a dynamic theory in which firms adjust their financial reporting, lobbying intensity, and organizational structures in response to both market competition and anticipated policy changes. The analysis further incorporates research on political connections and effective tax rates (Adhikari, Derashid, and Zhang, 2006), showing how firms that are embedded in political networks are able to translate accounting strategies into durable fiscal advantages. The article also engages deeply with recent research on market concentration and the rise of superstar firms, which has documented the growing dominance of a small number of highly profitable, often multinational enterprises in both advanced and emerging economies (Autor et al., 2020; Affeldt et al., 2021; Bajgar et al., 2021). These firms, because of their size, intangible asset intensity, and global reach, possess unparalleled capacity to shift profits and to lobby for favorable tax treatment. The study argues that this concentration of economic power fundamentally alters the tax policy equilibrium, weakening the state’s ability to tax capital effectively while increasing the burden on smaller, less mobile firms and on labor. By synthesizing these literatures, the article advances a unified framework that explains why corporate tax bases have eroded in many jurisdictions despite nominally stable statutory tax rates. Methodologically, the study adopts a qualitative-quantitative synthesis grounded in longitudinal and comparative reasoning. Rather than presenting new numerical estimates, it integrates findings from existing empirical studies with a detailed theoretical model of firm behavior. This approach allows for a nuanced interpretation of how earnings management, profit shifting, and political influence interact over time. The results demonstrate that firms facing intense product market competition and those operating in highly concentrated industries adopt markedly different tax strategies, a pattern consistent with evidence from China (Cai and Liu, 2009) and from European and global contexts (Buijink et al., 2002; Blouin and Robinson, 2019). The discussion situates these findings within broader debates on fiscal capacity, inequality, and globalization. It argues that the erosion of the corporate tax base is not an inevitable byproduct of globalization but the outcome of strategic behavior by powerful firms operating within permissive institutional frameworks. The article concludes by outlining policy implications, including the need for greater transparency, coordination across tax jurisdictions, and reforms to corporate governance that align managerial incentives with social objectives. In doing so, it contributes to a deeper understanding of how corporate taxation, accounting practices, and market power jointly shape the distribution of economic resources in the contemporary global economy.
Copyright (c) 2025 Dr. Daniel Kowalski, Dr. Ahmed Ben Youssef (Author) https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
Hybrid Security Orders, Non-State Violence, and the Political Economy of Insecurity in Nigeria’s Conflict Ecosystem
The contemporary Nigerian security landscape is characterized by the coexistence of state institutions, armed non-state actors, community militias, criminal syndicates, religious movements, and transnational terrorist networks, all embedded within a deeply contested political economy. This article develops a theoretically grounded and empirically informed interpretation of Nigeria’s evolving conflict ecosystem by situating it within broader debates on hybrid political orders, non-state actors in international relations, and the global transformation of warfare. Drawing on the analytical frameworks of new wars theory, hybrid governance, and transnational activism, the study demonstrates how Boko Haram, rural banditry, Niger Delta militancy, and inter-religious violence are not isolated pathologies but structurally interlinked outcomes of state fragility, elite competition, and globalized security dynamics (Kaldor, 2006; Boege et al., 2009; Reno, 2011). The article further integrates strategic assessments of global and regional security environments provided by contemporary intelligence analysis to contextualize Nigeria’s conflicts within wider geopolitical and ideological currents (National Intelligence Council, 2023). By doing so, it challenges conventional state-centric interpretations of Nigerian insecurity and instead advances a relational model in which state and non-state actors continuously renegotiate authority, legitimacy, and control. Drawing extensively on the literature on Boko Haram, the Niger Delta, and rural banditry, the study reveals how violence functions simultaneously as a political instrument, an economic strategy, and a form of social ordering (Aghedo & Osumah, 2012; Comolli, 2015; Ikelegbe, 2006; Okoli & Ugwu, 2019). Methodologically, the article employs a qualitative, interpretivist research design based on intensive textual analysis of scholarly literature, policy reports, and international security assessments. This allows for a nuanced reconstruction of the discursive, material, and institutional dimensions of Nigerian conflict. The results demonstrate that Nigeria’s insecurity cannot be meaningfully addressed through militarized counterterrorism or state-building alone, because violence is embedded in hybrid governance arrangements that link local actors to global networks of finance, ideology, and power (Lake, 2010; Sikkink, 1998). The discussion situates Nigeria’s conflicts within broader debates about sovereignty, non-state power, and global order, arguing that Nigeria exemplifies a post-Westphalian security environment in which authority is fragmented and contested across multiple levels (Waltz, 1979; Kant, 1795). The article concludes by proposing that sustainable peace in Nigeria requires not the restoration of a mythical centralized state monopoly of violence, but the construction of inclusive, negotiated, and accountable hybrid political orders that recognize the realities of non-state authority while embedding them within normative frameworks of peace and human security (Olojo, 2021; Mercy Corps, 2016).
Copyright (c) 2025 Dr. Elias M. Koffi, Dr. Sofia Renata Alvarez, Dr. Youssef Ben Khaled (Author) https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
Climate-Resilient Infrastructure and Financial Vulnerabilities: Integrating Risk, Policy, and Systemic Adaptation
The accelerating impacts of climate change, manifesting through extreme weather events, rising sea levels, and systemic disruptions, necessitate a comprehensive reevaluation of infrastructure resilience and associated financial mechanisms. This research critically examines the theoretical and practical dimensions of climate-resilient infrastructure, exploring the interplay between environmental stressors, risk management strategies, and socio-economic consequences. By synthesizing evidence from multiple domains, including urban economics, energy systems, and disaster finance, this study elucidates the systemic vulnerabilities that underpin contemporary infrastructure networks. Emphasis is placed on integrating climate risk into municipal finance, supply chain logistics, and power system resilience, while evaluating both behavioral and institutional responses to environmental uncertainty. This study adopts a multidisciplinary framework that bridges policy perspectives, engineering considerations, and financial instruments, drawing upon the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development’s (2018) guidelines on climate-resilient infrastructure as a foundational reference. Key findings indicate that effective resilience strategies must transcend technical robustness, incorporating regulatory alignment, stakeholder engagement, and adaptive financial mechanisms. The research underscores the significance of catastrophe bonds, insurance design, and adaptive regulatory policies in mitigating financial and operational risks associated with climate-induced infrastructure shocks. The implications extend to urban planners, policymakers, and financial institutions, highlighting the necessity of coordinated strategies that align environmental sustainability with systemic risk management. This article contributes to the growing discourse on climate resilience by offering a nuanced understanding of the interdependencies between infrastructure integrity, socio-economic stability, and policy-driven interventions. Ultimately, the study provides actionable insights for enhancing the resilience of infrastructure systems in the context of an increasingly volatile climate landscape.
Copyright (c) 2026 Dr. Elena V. Petrov (Author) https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
Corporate Incentives, Tax Shelter Dynamics, And the Political Economy Of Multinational Profit Shifting
The contemporary architecture of corporate taxation has evolved into a deeply contested institutional field in which legal engineering, managerial incentives, and political bargaining intersect in increasingly complex ways. This article develops a comprehensive theoretical and empirical synthesis of how executive compensation structures, corporate governance arrangements, and multinational organizational forms interact with tax shelter strategies and profit shifting practices. Drawing on a wide spectrum of financial economics, accounting, labor economics, and public finance literature, the analysis situates tax sheltering not as an isolated phenomenon of technical tax planning but as a systemic outcome of agency conflicts, capital market pressures, and the strategic behavior of firms operating across heterogeneous regulatory regimes. A central thread of the argument is that the historical trajectory of tax shelter proliferation and regulatory response, famously conceptualized in the policy-oriented analysis of the early 2000s, remains deeply relevant for understanding contemporary multinational tax avoidance. The seminal account of the “tax shelter battle” articulated the institutional arms race between tax authorities and sophisticated taxpayers, revealing how enforcement capacity, political constraints, and private innovation jointly shape compliance outcomes (Bankman, 2004). This article extends that framework by embedding it within modern theories of corporate governance and global value chains. The study advances three interrelated claims. First, executive compensation and ownership structures create powerful incentives for managers to engage in aggressive tax planning when after-tax cash flows directly feed into performance metrics and equity valuations, a relationship long explored in the literature on agency problems and pay-for-performance (Bebchuk and Fried, 2003; Core et al., 1999). Second, multinational firms’ ability to fragment production and allocate intangible assets across jurisdictions amplifies the scope for book–tax divergence and profit shifting, a dynamic rooted in both international trade theory and empirical tax research (Antràs and Yeaple, 2014; Desai, 2003). Third, the political economy of tax enforcement, shaped by lobbying, regulatory capture, and distributional conflict, conditions the effectiveness of anti-avoidance regimes, often resulting in selective deterrence rather than universal compliance (Arayavechkit et al., 2018; Crocker and Slemrod, 2003). Methodologically, the article employs a qualitative–analytical approach that synthesizes theoretical models, historical policy analysis, and comparative institutional reasoning. Rather than presenting new numerical estimates, it reconstructs the causal mechanisms through which incentives, organizational structures, and regulatory frameworks interact. The results demonstrate that aggressive tax behavior is neither a mere legal arbitrage nor a purely moral failing but a predictable equilibrium in a system where managerial rewards, shareholder expectations, and competitive pressures converge. The discussion explores how this equilibrium contributes to rising market concentration, declining labor shares, and widening income inequality, connecting tax avoidance to broader macroeconomic trends (Autor et al., 2020; Affeldt et al., 2021; Alstadsæter et al., 2022). The article concludes by outlining avenues for reform that recognize the intertwined nature of corporate governance and tax policy, arguing that durable solutions require rethinking both managerial incentives and the transnational coordination of tax rules.
Copyright (c) 2025 Leonard Moreau (Author) https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
Networked Power, Ideological Realignment, And Security Transformation In The Contemporary Middle East
The contemporary Middle East is undergoing a profound structural reconfiguration marked by the erosion of unipolar external dominance, the proliferation of non-state military actors, the normalization of relations between erstwhile adversaries, and the emergence of ideologically hybrid foreign policy doctrines. This article offers a comprehensive, theoretically grounded, and empirically anchored analysis of this transformation by integrating critical political economy, classical realism, constructivist security studies, and networked geopolitics. Drawing upon a wide range of scholarly works, including Carr’s foundational realist critique of interwar liberalism (Carr, 1939), Agbiboa’s analysis of jihadist organizational transformation (Agbiboa, 2015), and recent scholarship on Gaza, Iran, Hamas, and regional multilateralism, the study advances the argument that the Middle East is transitioning from a system of hierarchical alliance structures to a fluid, networked regional order. In this emerging order, power is no longer monopolized by states or external patrons but is distributed across interconnected nodes composed of states, militias, economic alliances, ideological movements, and security providers. The article situates the October 7 Hamas operation, the Gaza war, the Abraham Accords, Iran’s “Look to the East” doctrine, and the South Caucasus realignment within a unified theoretical framework that explains how declining Western hegemony and intensifying intra-regional interdependence have reconfigured strategic behavior (Hokayem, 2023; Krieg, 2024; Perletta, 2024). Hamas is conceptualized not merely as a militant group but as an adaptive political-military organization embedded in a transnational resistance network (Hamoud, 2024; Brown, 2024). Iran is examined as a hybrid power that fuses ideological resistance with pragmatic multipolar diplomacy (Bazoobandi et al., 2023; Divsallar & Azizi, 2023). The Gulf states and Israel are shown to be redefining security through economic and technological interdependence rather than territorial deterrence (Fulton & Yellinek, 2021; Priya, 2024). Methodologically, the article employs qualitative comparative analysis and interpretive geopolitical modeling, relying on structured literature synthesis and historical contextualization. The findings demonstrate that Middle Eastern security dynamics can no longer be understood through alliance politics alone but must be analyzed through the logic of overlapping networks of cooperation and confrontation. The discussion further explores the normative implications of this shift for sovereignty, legitimacy, and conflict resolution, arguing that the region is moving toward a post-Western multilateralism that is unstable yet resilient (Fawcett, 2025). By synthesizing diverse literatures into a single analytical architecture, this study fills a critical gap in Middle Eastern international relations theory and provides a conceptual foundation for understanding the region’s evolving geopolitical future.
Copyright (c) 2025 Dr. Elias Moretti (Author) https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
THE PRICE OF WINNING: WHEN INDIVIDUAL BONUSES BACKFIRE ON TEAMS
Every manager faces a fundamental choice: should you reward your team for cooperating, or for competing? It’s a high-stakes question. Team-based rewards can build a sense of unity but often invite some members to slack off. On the other hand, competitive, winner-take-all bonuses can light a fire under individuals but risk turning colleagues into rivals, leading to less help and even outright sabotage. This article dives into this dilemma, exploring how these forces play out, especially when teams are a mix of high-fliers and steady contributors. We look at the predictions from economic theory and then hold them up against the results of controlled lab experiments that mimic these workplace dynamics. The findings are surprising. Big bonuses don't always spark the extra effort you'd expect, and they certainly don't make up for the loss of helping hands. We also find that while people are reluctant to sabotage their teammates, they are also quick to stop offering help once competition enters the picture. For managers, the takeaway is clear: creating a balanced, mixed-skill team and focusing on more than just individual prizes is often the winning strategy.
Copyright (c) 2024 European Journal of Emerging Economics and Management
THE ENDURING VALUE OF FLEXIBILITY: HOTEL PRICING DYNAMICS AND BEHAVIORAL CONSUMER RESPONSES TO RISK MITIGATION OPTIONS
Have you ever wondered why that "flexible" hotel room always seems to cost a bit more, even when your trip is just around the corner and you're pretty sure you won't cancel? This article dives into that very question. While traditional economics often assumes we're all perfectly rational decision-makers, real-world observations show that our emotions and biases play a huge role in how we choose. We'll explore how hotels navigate this fascinating landscape, blending smart pricing strategies with an understanding of what makes us, the customers, tick. We'll look at how dynamic pricing works, why we feel certain prices are "fair," and the practical realities hotels face when they want to change their rates. By bringing together insights from behavioral science, revenue management, and business strategy, this study aims to give you a clearer picture of these complex market forces and offer some practical takeaways for anyone in the hospitality business.
Sacrifice, Suffrage, and Sweat: An Experimental Analysis of Democratic Choice and Effort Provision in Teams
Getting people to pull together is one of the oldest challenges of teamwork. In any group, there's a temptation for individuals to slack off and free-ride on the efforts of others. While managers have tried countless ways to solve this problem, one of the most powerful tools might be one we often overlook: democracy. This study explores a simple but powerful idea: what happens when you let a team vote on its own work rules, especially a rule that involves a shared sacrifice? We designed a laboratory experiment where teams of people worked on a real task. Some teams had a costly, unproductive work requirement forced upon them. Others got to vote on whether to adopt that same rule. Our findings were clear. The act of democratically choosing to make a sacrifice dramatically increased the team's productivity—far more than when the rule was simply imposed. It seems that collective choice builds a sense of commitment and legitimacy that helps people overcome the urge to free-ride. This research shows how democratic processes can be a practical tool for aligning individual and group goals, offering fresh insights for how we think about motivation, contracts, and management.
Market Share Dynamics as A Collusion Clue: A Look at The European Heavy Vehicle Industry
This article explores how changes in market shares can subtly signal collusive behavior among companies, focusing specifically on the well-known European heavy vehicle cartel. We used economic analysis tools, including methods to spot sudden shifts and changes in market patterns, to see how market shares behaved when competition was healthy versus when companies were secretly colluding. Our findings show that during the cartel's active period, the market experienced unusual stability and deliberate re-distribution of market shares. We also saw what we call "umbrella effects," where companies not part of the cartel actually benefited. These patterns clearly stray from what you'd expect in a truly competitive market and perfectly match what economic theories predict about cartels. Ultimately, this research highlights that analyzing market shares can be a powerful tool for competition authorities. Especially when combined with advanced economic models and machine learning, it can help them uncover and prevent anti-competitive practices, protecting consumers and ensuring fair markets.
Evaluating the Efficacy of Information Campaigns and Ecolabels by Environmental Non-Governmental Organizations in Mitigating Environmentally Harmful Components
Environmental Non-Governmental Organizations (NGOs) are increasingly stepping up their game, using clever strategies like public awareness campaigns and eco-friendly labels to nudge both consumers and businesses toward a greener path. This deep dive explores just how effective these non-market approaches are in getting rid of harmful ingredients from our products and their supply chains. We'll blend insights from economic theories about information, market signals, and the quiet power of "private politics" to build a clear picture of how NGOs, as trusted third parties, can fix market glitches. They help spark demand for and supply of products that are better for our planet. While getting the word out can really open people's eyes and change what they buy, we also acknowledge that the sheer number of eco-labels out there can sometimes confuse folks. Beyond that, this article carefully looks at the intricate dance between NGO activism, how companies react, and the bigger picture of government regulations. It highlights the tricky bits, the surprising wins, and ultimately, the limits of relying mostly on non-government efforts to protect our environment. Our goal is to offer a clear understanding of when these NGO-led strategies truly make a difference and when they might hit a wall.
Cultivating Organizational Well-Being: The Impact of Empowering Leadership and Psychological Strengths on Trust and Flourishing
This article delves into the powerful connection between positive leadership and our inner psychological strengths (what we call Psychological Capital or PsyCap), exploring how they collectively build trust and help people truly thrive at work. We gathered insights from two separate studies in India, surveying individuals in the bustling IT-BPM sector (310 participants) and various other service industries (255 participants). Using advanced statistical modeling, our findings consistently show that when leaders embrace positive approaches, it significantly boosts trust within the organization and strengthens employees' psychological resources. We also discovered that these psychological strengths are a strong indicator of both how much people trust their workplace and how well they are flourishing. Importantly, both positive leadership and our personal psychological strengths directly contribute to a sense of flourishing, even when we consider the role of trust. These insights highlight just how vital it is for organizations to foster empowering leadership styles and help their people build resilience, hope, optimism, and self-belief. Doing so creates a high-trust environment where everyone can truly thrive, offering valuable lessons for building healthier, more vibrant workplaces.
Bridging Digital Divides: Examining Data Mobility and System Compatibility Across Online Platforms
The rapid expansion of digital platforms has profoundly reshaped our economies and daily lives, offering incredible ways to connect and simplify tasks. Yet, this growth also brings significant questions about how much control we, as users, have over our own data and how easily we can move it between different services. This article dives into the crucial topics of data portability and interoperability, exploring what they mean for competition, our well-being as consumers, and the rules governing digital spaces. We'll use established economic ideas about what makes it hard to switch services, how networks grow, and how markets compete to understand the challenges posed by today's dominant digital platforms. We'll discuss the real benefits of being able to move our data around more freely, like sparking new ideas and making markets more dynamic. We'll also look at the tricky parts of making different systems work together smoothly. Finally, we'll touch on how different parts of the world, especially the European Union, are trying to tackle these issues. Ultimately, making data truly portable and systems truly interoperable is vital for preventing unfair practices, empowering us as consumers, and ensuring a vibrant, healthy digital world for everyone.